1984 Chevrolet Camaro junkyard find

Let’s talk about
Camaro power-to-weight ratios, by way of introduction to today’s
Junkyard Gem. The most underpowered Camaro ever sold was the 1975 base model, with a 105-horsepower straight-six giving this 3,421-pound car 33.71 pounds per tortured horse. By that standard, today’s 1984 Camaro wasn’t quite as bad, with each horse responsible for a mere 30.58 pounds.

dims?crop=1600%2C900%2C0%2C0&quality=85&format=jpg&resize=800%2C450&image uri=http%3A%2F%2Fo.aolcdn.com%2Fhss%2Fstorage%2Fmidas%2Fa9394eb4b90229c1f1a2ea3c2cb5d81%2F206178785%2F25%2B %2B1984%2BChevrolet%2BCamaro%2Bin%2BCalifornia%2Bwrecking%2Byard%2B %2Bphotograph%2Bby%2BMurilee%2BMartin

third-generation Camaro was
much lighter than
its increasingly porcine predecessor, so the use of a two-digit-horsepower four-cylinder engine wasn’t quite as disastrous as it might have been. Still, the idea of 92 horsepower
in a Camaro seemed like sacrilege during the
«Morning In America» era.

dims?crop=1600%2C900%2C0%2C0&quality=85&format=jpg&resize=800%2C450&image uri=http%3A%2F%2Fo.aolcdn.com%2Fhss%2Fstorage%2Fmidas%2F3107710033a43bb9b9c58d76f32a7add%2F206178788%2F29%2B %2B1984%2BChevrolet%2BCamaro%2Bin%2BCalifornia%2Bwrecking%2Byard%2B %2Bphotograph%2Bby%2BMurilee%2BMartin

It could have been (slightly) worse. The rough-running 2.5-liter Iron Duke engine,
made from one bank of the Pontiac 301-cubic-inch V8 to save money, made just 90 horses in the base 1982 and 1983 Camaros. The Iron Duke was available for the 1982 through 1986 model years, finally being replaced by the 135hp 2.8-liter V6 as the base engine for 1987.

dims?crop=1600%2C900%2C0%2C0&quality=85&format=jpg&resize=800%2C450&image uri=http%3A%2F%2Fo.aolcdn.com%2Fhss%2Fstorage%2Fmidas%2F180d893c23f59a6921d79f488a34c1e0%2F206178791%2F11%2B %2B1984%2BChevrolet%2BCamaro%2Bin%2BCalifornia%2Bwrecking%2Byard%2B %2Bphotograph%2Bby%2BMurilee%2BMartin

At least this car has a five-speed manual transmission. Imagine the misery of a Duked Camaro with an automatic. Yes,
it happened.

dims?crop=1600%2C900%2C0%2C0&quality=85&format=jpg&resize=800%2C450&image uri=http%3A%2F%2Fo.aolcdn.com%2Fhss%2Fstorage%2Fmidas%2Fc71e6e7ab29bfdfc5d52730dd59621e6%2F206178794%2F43%2B %2B1984%2BChevrolet%2BCamaro%2Bin%2BCalifornia%2Bwrecking%2Byard%2B %2Bphotograph%2Bby%2BMurilee%2BMartin

Because most car shoppers aren’t idiots, a quick test drive convinced even the most budget-minded 1982-86 Camaro (and
Firebird) shoppers to ante up the $250 for the 2.8-liter V6. Very few of these cars came off the assembly line with the Duke under the hood.

dims?crop=1600%2C900%2C0%2C0&quality=85&format=jpg&resize=800%2C450&image uri=http%3A%2F%2Fo.aolcdn.com%2Fhss%2Fstorage%2Fmidas%2Fb9982dab90e6d88f7fa2ce37683dafe8%2F206178796%2F39%2B %2B1984%2BChevrolet%2BCamaro%2Bin%2BCalifornia%2Bwrecking%2Byard%2B %2Bphotograph%2Bby%2BMurilee%2BMartin

This one has most of the paint burned off its upper surfaces from years of California sunshine, and it’s shod with three space-saver spares plus a random van wheel. This suggests that the car spent years or decades sitting unloved and de-wheeled in a field somewhere before being dragged away forever.

dims?crop=1600%2C900%2C0%2C0&quality=85&format=jpg&resize=800%2C450&image uri=http%3A%2F%2Fo.aolcdn.com%2Fhss%2Fstorage%2Fmidas%2Fc601e16e983f59fb856599ae44ce6462%2F206178798%2F26%2B %2B1984%2BChevrolet%2BCamaro%2Bin%2BCalifornia%2Bwrecking%2Byard%2B %2Bphotograph%2Bby%2BMurilee%2BMartin

If you wanted a very cheap rear-wheel-drive
Chevy with an economical four-cylinder engine in 1984, the
Chevette Scooter would have been the more sensible choice. Weighing just 1,988 pounds and powered by a 65-horsepower
Isuzu engine, the Scooter’s power-to-weight ratio was nearly identical to that of the Iron Duke Camaro’s, and the price tag was $4,997 versus the Camaro’s $7,985.

Take-charge people taking charge!

Deja un comentario